WH Group Ltd
288:HK KYG960071028
Key Information
HQ:
China
Market Cap:
$7.78bn
Primary Markets:
North America, Asia, Europe & Russia
Company Information
Company Summary
WH Group is the largest pork company in the world, with number one positions in China, the US and key markets in Europe. It integrates hog production, hog slaughtering and the processing and distribution of packaged meats and fresh pork. It is a majority shareholder in Henan Shuanghui Investment & Development, China's largest meat processing business. It also owns Smithfield Foods in the US.![WH Group](http://images.ctfassets.net/kc2xclar6nri/4vlyjA9aZ2JrAWr3v47LqK/b568519cb9b8e10b7f67a22a7a44cbc4/WH_Group.jpg?fit=scale&w=1320&fm=webp)
Revenue
Total revenue:
$27.3bn
Revenue by Geography
Revenue by Protein
Revenue by Product Type
Disclosures
CDP ScoresLast Reviewed: 11/10/2023
CDP Climate | CDP Forests | CDP Water |
---|---|---|
No | No | No |
Science Based Target initiativeLast Reviewed: 03/10/2023
Target classification | Status | Date |
---|---|---|
Has not set SBT | Withdrawn | - |
Coller FAIRR Protein Producer Index
Analysis Overview
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Deforestation & Biodiversity Water Use & Scarcity Waste & Pollution Antibiotics Animal Welfare Working Conditions Food Safety Sustainability Governance Alternative Proteins
Analysis Breakdown
Risk Score
36/100
Medium Risk
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
31/100
Scope 1, 2 & 3 Target
25/100
Type of Target
As per the website of SBTi, the subsidiary - Smithfield has removed its commitment to SBTi
0/3
Strength of Target - Non-SBT
The company has set a group-wide target to reduce emissions per unit by 30% compared to a 2017 baseline across the value chain. It also discloses that Smithfield Foods has imposed a 30% absolute reduction in GHG emissions by 2030 across its entire value chain. The base year of the target is 2010. It aims to reduce emissions per unit by 30% compared to a 2017 baseline across the value chain. However, it has yet to disclose the breakdown of this target based on Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.
1.25/2
Innovation on GHG Emission Reduction
36/100
Innovation to Reduce Agriculture Emissions
Smithfield is working with grain supply farmers and helping them to reduce crop inputs and improve crop yields by investing in carbon reduction and conservation methods. The geographic scope is limited to certain geographies as target information only covers Smithfield Foods.
0.8/1
Feed Farming Innovation
The company is trying to reduce emissions from feed farms, including researching the impact of novel feed ingredients. It reduced GHG emissions associated with feed by more than 100,000 tons from a 2010 baseline.
1/2
Animal Farming Innovation
The company's subsidiary, Smithfield, has projects to generate energy from manure biogas projects, which are covered elsewhere in the assessment. It does not disclose any further information.
0/2
Quality of GHG Inventory
53/100
Quality and scope of GHG inventory Completeness
The company discloses its Scope 1 emissions to be 3,513,674 metric tons of CO2e, Scope 2 emissions to be 2,030,585 metric tons of CO2e, and Scope 3 emissions to be 29,699,786 metric tons of CO2e for US region. Since the company discloses Scope 3 emissions for US region only, the geographic scope is limited to certain geographies.
1.2/1.5
Feed & Animal Farming Emissions
The company's US subsidiary - Smithfield Foods, discloses that 38% of its carbon footprint can be attributed to manure management. Smithfield Foods also discloses that 25% of its carbon footprint can be attributed to grain farms and feed milling.
1/2
Transparency of GHG Inventory
The company's US subsidiary, Smithfield Foods, responded to the CDP Climate Change questionnaire in 2022. Another subsidiary, Shuanghui Development, engages a third-party professional service to monitor emissions data in China. However, it does not disclose that a third party audits other regions' GHG data. Furthermore, per the Smithfield CDP Climate Change 2022 disclosure, third-party verification of emission data still needs to be done. Therefore, the geographic scope is specified and limited to certain geographies.
0.45/1.5
Emissions Performance
5/100
Overall Emission Performance
The company discloses an increase in Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions from 2,583,565 MT CO2e in 2021 to 5,544,259 MT CO2 in 2022. The company also discloses 29,699,786 MT CO2e Scope 3 emissions for US region. However, it does not disclose Scope 3 emissions for 2021. Therefore, a comparison can not be made. It states that it shrunk the emissions associated with manure management from 40-45% of its total emissions in 2010 to 27% in 2020. However, it does not disclose a decrease in absolute emissions in the past two years.
0.25/5
Climate-related Scenario Analysis
35/100
Climate-related Scenarios Analysis Conducted
The company conducted climate scenario analysis using RCP 2.6, 4.5 and 6.0
1/1
Disclosure of Analysis Results on Material Risks
The company's US subsidiary-Smithfield, mentions temperature shifts could impact the cost and availability of corn and other feed crops. However, it does not say how it will manage this risk. The company discloses that to meet the growing energy demand; it implements a series of optimisation measures to improve energy efficiency. The company implemented an intelligent cloud energy management platform in 14 facilities across China, allowing automatic meter readings with better energy measurement accuracy and real-time monitoring. This enables timely identification of energy consumption issues and improvement measures for rapid response to data anomalies and improves management and energy utilisation. Another project is the Ammonia Heat Pump Innovation Project, which recycles heat discharged from refrigeration using heat pump technology, reducing energy costs and saving 3,263 tons of steam. It also upgraded the Smithfield facility using a boiler house, which will reduce CO2 emissions by 50%. Smithfield Foods discusses the risk of taxation of operations and carbon emissions, which may affect the prices of its inputs. It needs to disclose how it will manage this risk.
0.75/3
Disclosure of Financial Material Events & Alignment of CAPEX
The company does not disclose its commitment to align capital expenditures with its GHG targets.
0/1
Deforestation & Biodiversity
3/100
Deforestation/Conversion-free Target - Soy for Animal Feed
0/100
Risk Assessment to Identify High-risk Locations
The company sources soybeans as a raw material for meats and pork operations. However, it does not disclose how it manages soy-related deforestation risks.
0/0.5
Strength of Deforestation Commitment
The company does not have a soy deforestation or conversion-free target. Further, its subsidiary, Smithfield Foods, has not yet committed to responsibly or sustainably sourcing soy.
0/3.25
Transparency - Progress Against Commitment
The company responds to the CDP Forests Questionnaire 2022 but only discloses timber products, not soy.
0/1.25
Engagement, Monitoring & Traceability - Soy for Animal Feed
5/100
Supplier Engagement
The company does not disclose any deforestation-related reference in its supplier code of conduct and supplier selection process. Its 2022 ESG report commits to promoting biodiversity conservation under its corporate principles. Also, it prioritises suppliers who demonstrate efforts to avoid direct or indirect harm to biodiversity but does not reference deforestation. To further this commitment, it plans to develop a sustainable sourcing policy providing detailed guidance on sourcing raw materials and incorporating certification standards. It also states that Smithfield Grain was established to source feed commodities from local farmers. However, no further information is disclosed on any support it provides to soy producers to encourage deforestation-free production or improve traceability.
0/1.25
Compliance monitoring & Traceability
The company does not disclose how compliance in monitored or what actions are taken if non-compliance occurs. Further, the company does no disclose the level of traceability it has of its soy supply chain.
0/3.25
Feed Innovation
Across the US, Smithfield Grain partners with independent agronomic consultants to help farmers develop site-specific nitrogen management tools to optimise nutrient absorption, use less fertiliser, and optimise soil health using alternative crops and curated seed mixes.
0.25/0.5
Water Use & Scarcity
21/100
Water Use & Scarcity in Facilities
34/100
Monitoring Water Consumption & Withdrawals
The company conducted a water risk assessment in 2016. Results indicate that various operations face little to no risk and do not significantly impact local water supplies, and none of the company's water comes from protected sources. The regions with limited water are closely monitored regarding water availability and potential changes. However, this assessment must be updated as of the reporting year. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that processing facilities only operate in areas of low water stress. Smithfield discloses that the issues considered in its risk assessment include water availability and the status of ecosystems and habitats. The company mentions that the results showed that its operations faced little to no risk. It discloses that it monitors water availability for the few operations facing limited risk. Overall, Smithfield Foods announces that it monitors discharged wastewater quality parameters. For its operations in China, the company has internal water management mechanisms at different levels to monitor and manage water risks. The company operates water consumption by reducing freshwater use and using recycled water in its production activities. The company, in FY2022, reports the total water consumption.
0.49/0.75
Target to Reduce Water Consumption & Withdrawals
The company's US subsidiary, Smithfield, set a target to reduce water use per 100 pounds of product produced by 10% by 2020; using 2014 as a baseline, the company achieved 90% of its target. However, there has yet to be a follow-up target put in place. It plans to reassess its US water supply footprint and adopt internationally recognised water stewardship standards by 2025. The group's subsidiary, Shuanghui, aims to reduce water consumption per unit by 10% by 2030 compared to a 2019 baseline.
0.1/1
Disclosure & Performance of Water Risks in Facilities
The group discloses its water consumption by source. It informs not withdrawing water from areas identified as water-stressed based on its risk assessment. As this disclosure only covers Smithfield, the geographic scope to which this statement applies is limited. WH Group as a whole does not disclose water-related CAPEX. However, its subsidiary, Smithfield Foods, discloses that water-related CAPEX increased by 10% in the reporting year. The group as a whole does not disclose water-related OPEX. However, Smithfield disclosed that water-related OPEX has increased by 3%. Smithfield responded to the CDP Water questionnaire in 2022. The group's total volume of freshwater consumption has increased in 2022. The company's US subsidiary, Smithfield, discloses water withdrawal volumes by source in the reporting year. After adding water withdrawal from both US and international operations, it can be concluded that it will increase in 2022.
1.1/3.25
Water Use & Scarcity in Feed Farming
20/100
Supplier Engagement in Water Use in Feed Farming
Smithfield, busness code of conduct has a high-level statement on minimising water use and wastewater generation. This subsidiary owns various feed mills and produces feed for the group. Smithfield implemented a program with grain supply farmers to implement best practices for producing grain supply for hog feed, including improved water efficiency. It also works with farm-related organisations to engage grain farmers on best practices to reduce water use. However, it needs to provide further detail on how it guides or supports feed suppliers to improve water efficiency.
1/2.5
Disclosure of Water Risks in Feed Farming
The company's US subsidiary, Smithfield, discloses that maize is the most significant water-intensive agricultural commodity used as feed for the hogs. The company does not disclose to the CDP regarding soy or other feed commodities. Regarding maize, Smithfield discloses that it does not currently have data on the proportion sourced from areas of water stress but intends to obtain this data within the next two years.
0/2.5
Water Use & Scarcity in Animal Farming
10/100
Supplier Engagement in Water Use in Animal Farming
Smithfield intends to calculate the proportion of maize produced in water-stressed areas within the next two years. However, the company does not disclose the proportion of protein produced and/or sourced in water-stressed regions. It states that in China, Shuanghui Development is working with its upstream and downstream suppliers to uphold biodiversity conservation in various aspects such as environmental protection, construction, soil and water conservation, and energy conservation. The company also provides information on different water-saving techniques used at its farms but needs a sustainable agricultural policy focusing on water scarcity risks.
0.5/3
Disclosure of Water Risks in Animal Farming
The company has not established partnerships with third parties to input into sourcing/farming strategy, including water use.
0/2
Waste & Pollution
23/100
Wastewater at Facilities
31/100
Disclosure & Targets for Wastewater Quality & Volume Discharged
The company's US subsidiary, Smithfield, discloses 15 incidents of noncompliance with water quality permits, standards, and regulations. This data is for the year ending 31 December 2022, and, as per CDP Water Security 2022, the company discloses seven water-related fines. The company aims to conserve water quality and availability through conservation, efficiency and cooperation with related stakeholders. However, this target does not constitute primary pollutants such as COD, BOD, Total Nitrogen or phosphorus.
0/1.5
Transparency on Water Pollution Risks
The company discloses the volume of wastewater discharged in the reporting year. One company's subsidiaries, Smithfield Foods, responded to the CDP Water Security questionnaire in 2022.
0.65/2
Performance on Wastewater Quality & Volume Discharged
The company's US subsidiary, Smithfield Foods, discloses that it has partnered with Optima BioEnergy on wastewater-to-RNG biogas projects. This helps protect water resources while producing clean energy. The company reduced its wastewater discharge in FY2022.
0.9/1.5
Nutrient Management in Feed Farming
24/100
Supplier Engagement in Nutrient Pollution Risks
The company collaborates with the Environment Defense Fund (EDF) to optimise fertiliser use and improve soil quality. In the US, the company started the SmithfieldGro project, which helps farmers across the supply chain to improve crop yield by reducing pesticide pollution to water resources and soil erosion, thereby reducing carbon emissions. Smithfield Grain also partners with independent agronomic consultants across the US to help farmers develop site-specific sustainability strategies to help farmers reduce water use and improve water quality, service nitrogen management tools to optimise nutrient absorption and use less fertiliser, as well as using alternative crops and curated seed mixes to optimise soil health.
0.6/4
Innovation to Improve Nutrient Management in Feed Farming
The company discloses that Smithfield has the SmithfieldGro project in the US, which works with upstream farmers to reduce pesticide pollution to water resources and soil erosion. However, further information was not found in the report.
0.6/1
Manure Management in Animal Farming
13/100
Disclosure of Pollution Risks from Manure
The company's owned operations started adding anaerobic digesters in 2018. The company mentions that as of 2022, it operates more than 100 digesters. The company feeds Renewable Natural Gas pipelines in the US, while in Mexico, it heats hog barns with biogas. The company only produces biogas in its Smithfield operations. It explores developing a process to remove and dry sludge from the lagoons. The company does not produce biogas in China, but it discloses that manure is converted into organic fertiliser. It states that its subsidiary has been using the World Business Council for Sustainable Development's (WBCSD) Global Water Tool and the GEMI Local Water Tool developed by the Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI) since 2010 to assess its water impacts. However, the Global Water Tool was decommissioned in 2019.
0.4/1.25
Supplier Engagement in Manure Management
The company does not make site-specific nutrient management plans a part of its supplier's contractual agreement and/or own farms management. Nor does it provides technical and/or financial support to suppliers and/or own farms to develop nutrient management plans and improve manure storage.
0/1.5
Innovation to Improve Nutrient Management in Animal Farming
Smithfield has partnered with Anuvia‚Ñ¢ Plant Nutrients to produce commercial-grade fertiliser from its manure.
0.25/2.25
Antibiotics
58/100
Policy on Antibiotics Use
69/100
Policy on Antibiotics Use
The company commits to responsible antibiotic use, mandates supplier compliance, and conducts regular health assessments following veterinarian guidelines. Shuanghui Development and Smithfield Foods subsidiaries monitor and reduce antibiotic usage and explore alternative treatments. Smithfield restricts medically necessary antibiotics for growth promotion and has a dedicated oversight task force. Vaccination programs, preventive health and biosecurity measures are universally implemented across subsidiaries. However, it needs to be clarified if the no-routine-use policy applies globally, including in China, thus covering most but not all pork facilities. The company does not disclose its stance on the routine use of other types of antibiotics.
3.43/5
Disclosure of Quantity of Antibiotics Used
48/100
Disclosure of Quantity of Antibiotics Used
The company discloses a decrease in antibiotic use in pig farming in its 2022 ESG report, with a 4.4% reduction to 260 mg/kg in China and a 3.3% reduction to 239 mg/kg in the US compared to 2021. However, it neither elucidates the reasons for antibiotic use nor confirms the audit of the data.
2.38/5
Animal Welfare
35/100
Animal Welfare Policy
38/100
Welfare Policy
The company has an Animal Care Management System and Policy overseen by a dedicated committee since 2002. It conducts regular audits and training focused on animal safety, comfort, and health. Its subsidiaries, Shuanghui and Smithfield, extend this commitment through various programmes and swift corrective actions for non-compliance. The company collaborates with third-party panels for policy review and is involved in R&D through its subsidiaries. However, it does not disclose group-wide actions for non-compliance.
1.4/2
Key Welfare Issues
The company's subsidiary, Shuanghui, commits to animal welfare by avoiding long-distance transport and equipping vehicles with thermal insulation for chicken comfort. It also saves to humane slaughter methods, such as advanced CO2. In Romania and Poland, efforts are underway to explore and implement environmental enrichments for pigs. However, there is no commitment to avoiding close confinement nor specific mention of reducing transport time to under eight hours.
0.5/3
Assurance & Certification
25/100
Auditing & Assurance by an Animal Welfare Organisation
The company mandates Pork Quality Assurance Plus (PQA+) certification for all suppliers, ensuring compliance with various standards, including animal welfare and hygiene. Additionally, 86% of its contract finishing farms in Poland are certified under Global Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). The company's United States operations at Smithfield are certified by the United States Department of Agriculture Process Verified Program (USDA PVP), and 86% of contract finishing farms in Poland are certified to Good Agricultural Practices (Global GAP). It also mandates that all suppliers be certified under the Pork Quality Assurance Plus (PQA Plus) programme. However, no information is disclosed regarding internal auditing in Shuanghui operations.
0.98/4
Public Reporting on Welfare
The company commits to group housing for pregnant sows and reports 100% adoption in its company-owned farms. It also encourages U.S.-based live animal suppliers to adopt group housing, with 36% compliance as of 2022. However, it does not disclose historical data for comparison.
0.25/1
Performance on Key Material Risks
44/100
Performance on Key Material Welfare Risks by Protein
The company commits to group housing for confirmed pregnant sows globally and adheres to EU pig and poultry housing requirements. However, it lacks disclosure on tail docking practices and maintains an unclear stance on surgical castration.
2.2/5
Working Conditions
48/100
Human Rights
20/100
Strength of Policy
The company commits in writing to respect human rights. The company's human rights policy is said to be aligned with the United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
1/1
Due Diligence Process
The company does not disclose that it carries out human rights due diligence. Further, while it conducts annual third-party audits of human rights compliance for its US and European operations, it does not explain how it identifies the next steps of action based on the results of these audits.
The company does not disclose how it mitigates human rights risks or provides remediation.
0/3
Evidence of Remediation
The company's subsidiary, Smithfield, has not identified any operations with significant risk for forced or compulsory labour and child labour incidents. However, the company does not disclose whether it conducts due diligence to identify human rights risks.
0/1
Fair Working Conditions
54/100
Policy for Direct Operations
The company strictly prohibits child labour, forced labour, discrimination and harassment. However, whether the company ensures its employees are paid at least a living wage is still being determined. The company discloses that in the US, Smithfield conducts third-party audits every year on approximately 25 to 30 factories about their human rights situations by the four-pillar (Labor Standards and Health, Safety, Environment and Business Ethics) standards of the Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (SMETA). Also, the company conducts external third-party human rights-related audits in Europe. However, whether these audits are for all the selected policy areas is still being determined. In addition, Smithfield's Supplier Code of Conduct states that it expects its suppliers to prohibit child labour, forced labour and harassment. That said, it does not discuss discrimination or fair wages. The company must mention whether it provides paid sick leave to all its workers.
1.68/3
Monitoring & Discosure
The company does not explicitly disclose conducting human rights audits in its supply chain.
The company has a whistleblower mechanism where customers, suppliers, contractors, creditors, debtors and employees can anonymously report misconduct, fraud, immorality, and non-compliance violations. However, the company does not write the number of grievances it received in the reporting year.
1/2
Safety & Turnover Data
57/100
Committee representation of workers
The company regards the health and safety of employees as priorities in its business activities. The company discloses that Shuanghui Development, a company subsidiary, has achieved ISO 45001 certification in four factories by the end of the reporting period. The company also aims to obtain ISO 45001 certification for all its US facilities by 2025. In addition, the company has a Safety Management Committee and Safety Production Leading Groups headed by the General Manager of each factory. However, the company does not disclose whether workers are represented on the Safety Production Leading Groups or the Safety Management Committee. Moreover, no health and safety committee is mentioned for the company's US operations.
0.6/2
Disclosure of safety and turnover data
The company reports an improvement in the injury rate (injuries per 200,000 working hours) from 1.54 in 2021 to 1.33 in 2022. The company's fatality rate has increased compared to the previous year. It rose from one fatality in 2021 to three fatalities in 2022. Also, the company discloses that the employee turnover rate in 2022 was 45%. Employee turnover rate is disclosed by gender, age, region and seniority level.
2.25/3
Freedom of Association
61/100
Strength of Policies
The group has operations in China, which are exempt from the question. However, the company does not disclose the unionisation rate for operations in regions where it supports freedom of association. Nor does the company provide evidence of measures to help its workers' rights to collective bargaining or freedom of association. Only the company's US subsidiary's supplier code of conduct requires suppliers to respect their employees' freedom of association.
1.6/3
Disclosure of Collective Bargaining Metrics
For the reporting period, the company discloses that collective bargaining agreements covered 100% of employees in China and Romina. This figure was 59% in the US and 15% in Poland. However, the company does not disclose a percentage of the workforce covered in Mexico. The company also breaks down its workforce by contract type, stating that 93% of its employees are full-time and 7% are contracted.
1.45/2
Food Safety
73/100
Food Safety System
50/100
Certifications
The company discloses that 100% of its owned facilities in the US and Europe (Poland and Romania) have BRCGS certification, which is GFSI-recognised and was audited by external independent institutions, including the ISO 22000, the SQF, the BRCGS and the IFS. However, whilst it discloses the number of factories in China with certification, it does not reveal the proportion of Chinese sites certified. Therefore, the ratio of total sites certified cannot be determined. In the US, suppliers must undergo annual GFSI certification or other appropriate third-party food safety and quality audits. Only US suppliers must have GFSI certification; it is assumed that this constitutes less than two-thirds of total suppliers.
2.25/3.5
Performance
The group has set up a Food Safety and Inspection team, which performs random inspections to ensure that the facilities meet specific standards. The company created a food safety risk control list covering every production chain process in China. A monthly three-level food safety inspection is conducted, led directly by each facility's manager and deputy manager. The Quality Control division oversees follow-ups to identify and address issues promptly and prevent the reoccurrence of relevant incidents as an effort to standardise safe and compliant production. However, no information was disclosed regarding audits of operations in Europe. It does not disclose its corrective action rates in China, European or US operations. In China, it has a product traceability platform that controls all aspects of product procurement, production, transportation and sales and ensures accurate and rapid execution of recalls should that occur. In the US, it utilises the product SKU and date code to ensure full traceability of products, ingredients, raw materials, and packaging. However, it does not disclose any definite consumer-facing technology for food safety.
0.25/1.5
Product Recalls & Market Bans
95/100
Product Recall Systems
In China, the company developed the "Food Recall Management Measures" and "Standard Operating Procedures for Product Recall", stipulating the requirements and procedures for product recall work. Another subsidiary, Smithfield, also conducts recall simulations. In Europe, it has a Product Recall Manual that defines response and product tracing protocols, including the appointment of a person in charge to ensure recalls are managed promptly and effectively. However, it does not disclose roles, responsibilities, documentation, or disposal procedures. The company discloses zero product recalls in its Shuanghui Development subsidiary and eight in its Smithfield subsidiary. Of the Smithfield recalls, one in the US was voluntary due to suspected metallic foreign objects; five in Poland were due to salmonella and doxycycline; and two in Romania were due to an African swine fever case and a Salmonella case. After the recall incidents at Smithfield, it invested in testing equipment and optimised critical processes at relevant facilities. Special employee training on food safety and risk management was also conducted for production sites with recalls to minimise human error. It states that all memories were appropriately handled and did not result in any food safety incidents.
2.75/3
Performance
The company's US subsidiary, Smithfield, disclosed no market bans in the reporting year.
2/2
Sustainability Governance
35/100
Assessment of a Company's Sustainability Governance
35/100
Board Sustainability
The company's board is responsible for assessing, defining, and managing ESG risks and objectives for the group. In addition, the company has conducted a materiality assessment and disclosed the identified issues. These include sustainable income growth, product quality and safety, response to climate change, occupational health and safety, and antibiotic use. The board of directors is responsible for the final review and approval of the material topics identified. The company does not disclose if it holds any board-level expertise in sustainability, food safety or innovation.
1.25/2
Incentives & Policy Engagement
The company considers it key to link remuneration to ESG performance for relevant management personnel. However, there is no explicit mention that the company has actually set executive variable monetary remunerations linked with sustainability performance. Furthermore, it has not disclosed engaging with civil or trade associations on ESG issues, a comprehensive list of trade association memberships or if it aligns any policy-engagement activities with the goal of restricting global temperature rise to 1.5C
0/2.5
Innovation & Benchmarking
In 2022, Shuanghui Development, a company subsidiary, continued its ammonia heat pump innovation project that recycles heat discharged from refrigeration using heat pump technology, reducing energy costs. The company has also been collaborating with BioCircuit Technologies to develop products that improve animal health and welfare, such as Nerve Tape, designed to seamlessly repair injured nerves. The company also discloses it benchmarks itself against peers in sustainability and innovation using the S&P Dow Jones Corporate Sustainability Assessment.
0.5/0.5
Alternative Proteins
35/100
Diversification of Products to Alternative Protein Sources
35/100
Existing product portfolio
The company states diversifying the plant-protein segment helps satisfy consumer needs and preferences. However, it does not disclose a timebound target for diversifying protein sources or report the sales/revenue linked to alternative protein sources.
0.25/2.5
Investing for future growth
In 2019, the company's subsidiary, Smithfield Foods, launched its dedicated alternative protein brand, "Pure Farmland", which produces a range of plant-based protein products. Its subsidiary, Shuanghui, also has a plant-based range under the brand "Vegetarian World." It discloses that it may undertake more R&D initiatives on alternative meat to launch innovative products. However, during the reporting period, it does not disclose further details on any investment for future growth.
1.5/2.5
Workstream Information
2023 Risk Score:
36/100
Level:
Medium Risk
Ranking:
26/60
Main Protein:
Pork
Assessed Proteins:
Pork
Company Feedback Given:
No
Last Updated:
31 October 2023
2023 Resources
2023/24 Index Report Summary (Mandarin) 报告总结摘要(中文) Launch of the Coller FAIRR Protein Producer Index 2023/24 2023/24 Company Dialogue Questions 2023/24 Full Report Coller FAIRR Protein Producer Index
Coller FAIRR Climate Risk Tool
Analysis Overview
Cost Increase
Cost Increase
EBIT Margin
Cost Increase (%)
60%
40%
20%
0%
-20%
-40%
-60%
Net Zero Aligned
BAU
High Climate Impact
Workstream Information
Last Updated:
5 April 2023
2023/24 Resources
Walkthrough Video 2023 Public Report 2023 (English) Public Report 2023 (Mandarin) Coller FAIRR Climate Risk Tool
Working Conditions Engagement
Analysis Overview
Grievance Mechanisms Economic Incentives Distribution by Contract Type Oversight of Governance Structure Support Worker Representation Engage Workers on Industry Trends
Analysis Breakdown
Health & Safety
Low
Grievance Mechanisms - Availability & Access
China (formerly known as Shuanghui)
The company discloses three channels are available for its workers in China to report grievances, including a whistleblowing telephone line, whistleblowing email, and a “manager opinion” mailbox, which are available 24/7. The company offers limited disclosure on the availability and access of these mechanisms; whilst the company has a system of protection for whistle-blowers and discloses that it offers anonymous reporting, it is unclear whether its channels have language support and are open to suppliers and third parties.
US (Smithfield)
The company discloses that workers in its US operations can raise grievances to managers, the HR department, or via Smithfield’s “Speak Up! Hotline”. The hotline is available via telephone, run by a third party, toll-free, available 24/7, and provides the option of anonymity. The company adds that it encourages business partners and third parties to also report compliance concerns.
Partial
Grievance Mechanisms - Effectiveness & Evaluation
The company states that employees in the US can provide feedback on reporting mechanisms via the following methods:
• A questionnaire completed in new employees’ first 90 days and weekly one-to-one meetings with management for new employees.
• Retention and exit interviews.
• Employee Advisory Council meetings at non-union plants.
• Joint Labour Management meetings at unionised plants.
However, it is unclear how each of these feedback methods assesses the effectiveness of the grievance reporting mechanisms. Further, WH Group’s public reporting does not indicate whether feedback or evaluation processes are in place to assess reporting mechanisms outside the US.
Low
Grievance Mechanisms - Categories & Reporting
The company reports that 600 employees and employee relatives used Smithfield’s hotline during the reporting year. The company discloses that Smithfield received reports on issues such as health and safety, discrimination and harassment, animal welfare, company policies, and human resources. However, the company does not break down how many grievances were received in each category or how many reports were received from third parties or suppliers.
The company does not disclose grievance reporting data for its operations in China.
Low
Grievance Mechanisms - Channels for H&S and Worker Rights
The company states that Smithfield received reports from employees relating to health and safety and discrimination and harassment during the reporting year. However, it is unclear if the company provides the opportunity for worker rights violations other than discrimination and harassment to be reported. Further, the company does not disclose which reporting categories are available to employees outside the US.
Low
Grievance Mechanisms - Resolution Process
WH Group discloses the process through which grievances received via email by the Audit Committee are investigated. The process involves:
• A preliminary investigation by the Audit Committee.
• An internal investigation.
• Consultations with third-party advisors.
• Law enforcement procedures.
However, it is unclear whether this process also covers grievances received by telephone or how the group investigates and resolves grievances received in the US.
Partial
Economic Incentives - Sick Pay Entitlement
WH Group discloses that employees in its US operations have access to paid sick leave. However, the company does not disclose details of this provision, such as the level of pay provided or the number of paid sick days available to employees. Further, WH Group does not disclose whether it provides paid sick leave to employees in its Chinese or European operations.
Low
Economic Incentives - Other Economic Incentives
Smithfield discloses that it has an employee referral bonus programme and an annual incentive programme for all salaried employees. However, the company does not disclose further details of either of these schemes. The company does not disclose whether it provides other economic incentives for employees in China.
Low
Fair Working Conditions
Partial
Distribution by Contract Type
WH Group discloses that 93% of its workforce are direct, full-time employees, and 7% are subcontracted. The company reports that 92.1% of its employees are frontline employees, 6.8% are middle management, and 1.1% are senior executives. WH Group also discloses the proportion of its workforce employed in each operating region: the US, Europe, and China.
Additionally, Smithfield reports the breakdown of its workforce across contract types, including temporary, part-time, and subcontracted workers.
Good
Oversight of Governance Structure
WH Group discloses that its ESG Committee reports to its Board of Directors on ESG performance and policies but does not disclose whether labour metrics are reported to the Board on a regular basis. Similarly, Smithfield’s Chief Sustainability Officer regularly meets with WH Group’s CEO and senior management to discuss environmental and social issues relevant to Smithfield, but the company does not disclose which labour metrics, if any, are discussed in these meetings.
Low
Worker Representation
Low
Support Worker Representation - Internal & External Structures
Board-level representation
The company does not disclose whether it has direct or indirect worker representation at the Board level.
Internal committees
WH Group discloses that workers at non-unionised plants in the US have an Employee Advisory Council. However, it is unclear whether internal representation is also offered in non-unionised plants. No internal forms of representation are disclosed for the company’s operations outside the US.
Dialogue with trade unions
Smithfield reports that some of its facilities are unionised and that it honours the collective bargaining agreements it has made with unions, demonstrating that it has engaged in constructive dialogues with union representatives. The company also requires suppliers to respect their employees’ rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining.
Partial
Support Worker Representation - Restrictions Under Law
Smithfield’s Human Rights Policy includes an acknowledgement that, in some countries, workers are unable to freely organise and associate with unions and that in these situations, the company is open to other forms of worker representation. The company does not disclose examples of what these alternative forms of representation are.
Low
Support Worker Representation - Operations in China
For its operations in China, WH Group discloses that all workers are covered by a “Collective Contract and Wage Negotiation Agreement”. The company states that this agreement consists of measures designed to protect worker rights relating to social insurance and working hours. However, the company does not disclose how or whether it works with provincial or county-level All-China Federation of Trade Unions branches to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of workers.
Low
Support Worker Representation - Collective Bargaining
WH Group discloses that, at Smithfield, collective bargaining agreements cover 100% of the workforce in Romania, 59% in the US, and 15% in Poland. The company states that in Mexico, two labour unions hold regular meetings to discuss labour issues, but the % of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements is not reported. Similarly, the % of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements in Hungry, Slovakia, and the UK is not disclosed. The company does not disclose extending the terms of collective bargaining agreements to all employees regardless of union status or contract type.
Partial
Engage Workers on Industry Trends - Impact assessment on Employees
Automation
The company reports that it is investing in automation to improve operational efficiency. However, no more detail is provided on the nature of this automation, and the company does not disclose having conducted a formal risk assessment of how this strategy may impact its workforce.
Climate risk
WH Group has set a near-term emissions reduction target, not yet SBTi certified, and Smithfield has committed to set a near-term SBT as well as being a member of the Business Ambition for 1.5°C. The company provides no disclosure on whether it has conducted a formal risk assessment of how its climate mitigation strategy may impact its workforce.
Low
Engage Workers on Industry Trends - Workforce Engagement
The company does not disclose whether it engages workers or their representatives in discussions about its automation and climate strategies.
Did Not Find
Engage Workers on Industry Trends - Just Transition
The company does not publicly state support for a Just Transition in the food sector.
Did Not Find
Workstream Information
YoY Performance:
Increased Disclosure
Index Working Conditions Score:
48/100
Assessed Proteins:
Pork
Last Updated:
18 March 2024
2023 Resources
Phase 3 | Progress Report Working Conditions Engagement
Waste & Pollution Engagement
Analysis Overview
Risk Assessment Value Chain Coverage Risk Mitigation Circularity Company Engagement
Summary
Smithfield’s collaboration with Anuvia to make its manure fully circular was discontinued after the latter filed for bankruptcy in mid-2023, leaving parent company WH Group looking for alternative options.
Analysis Breakdown
Risk Assessment
Poor
Coverage of water quality risk assessment
In 2022, Smithfield Foods completed a watershed analysis across its vertically integrated supply chain, including U.S. company-owned locations, contracted hog farms and grain suppliers.The company mentions that Smithfield Foods used the Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI) Local Water Tool, and the WRI Aqueduct tool. In China, the company mentions that it regularly tracks and identifies water use risks. However, it´s not clear what risk factors are considered specifically.
Transparency and disclosure of water quality indicators
The company mentions that in China, it monitors chemical oxygen demand (COD), phosphorus, nitrogen and suspended solids in wastewater. However, it does not disclose the figures.
Smithfield Foods discloses that in the reporting year there were 41 notices of violations at their US Facilities and International sites. The respective fines levied are also disclosed. However, it is unclear whether this is related to non-compliance with water quality permits, standards, and regulations. The company does not disclose information about its operations in China.
The company discloses it has increased its water-related CAPEX by 10% in the reporting year. The company also mentions a $45 million investment in 2023 in a new waterwater treatment plant in one facility in South Dakota. The company mentions that the upgraded system converts ammonia-nitrogen in wastewater to nitrate-nitrogen and further removes nitrate-nitrogen from wastewater. The company says this process has helped the company to reduce Smithfield¢â‚¬â„¢s overall nitrogen load to the Big Sioux River by two-thirds.
Recognition of nutrient pollution risk on biodiversity
Smithfield Foods discloses that it does no longer have US locations in high biodiverse value areas after exiting a facility that operated in California in early 2023. It’s not clear the methodology or parameters the company uses to classify areas as high biodiversity value. It does not provide information about other biomes or watersheds and the impact of nutrient pollution on these areas.
WH Group has included biodiversity and waste in its materiality assessment matrix. The company mentions it has made a commitment to promoting biodiversity conservation and it works with suppliers and contractors to uphold biodiversity conservation in various aspects. The company mentions a couple of initiatives to promote biodiversity and how it complies with pollution regulations in the different geographies it operates in, recognising the link between biodiversity loss and pollution. However, it’s not clear how biodiversity drives the company’s risk assessment for water quality and pollution.
Value Chain Coverage
Poor
Inclusion of upstream feed and livestock suppliers in risk assessment
In 2022, the company commissioned a study undertaking a water analysis to better understand current and future groundwater demands across its U.S operations, including contracted hog farms and grain suppliers. It’s not clear to what extent water quality risks are included in this assessment. The company does not disclose information about its operations in China.
Downstream use of manure by animal feed suppliers
The company mentions its Chinese operations promote circular economy by featuring regional crop production and farming, using the manure produced from farms as an organic fertiliser. However, it’s not clear whether the manure is used by the company’s feed suppliers or third-party arable farmers.
Acknowledgment of regulatory risks
The company does not disclose information on this.
Transparency on non-compliance from suppliers
The company mentions that it has standardised internal auditing systems for its farms in the US to ensure consistent environmental compliance across all its operations. However, it is unclear whether non- compliance on pollution is also included.
Smithfield Foods discloses that in the reporting year there were 41 notices of violations at their US Facilities and International sites. The respective fines levied are also disclosed. However, it is unclear whether this is related to non-compliance with water quality permits, standards, and regulations. Although the values of fines collected have been reported, no further detail is provided on the reasons for the NOV's or fines collected. The company is encouraged to provide this information. The company does not disclose information for its operations in China.
Risk Mitigation
Poor
Biogas generation and organic fertilisers from animal waste
The company discloses the volume of wastewater that has undergone different levels of treatment for its operations in the US. The company mentions 5829 megaliters/year are discharged by land irrigation on its company farms in the US. The company does not disclose information about the different levels of treatment for its operations in China.
In the US, the company mentions it generates 4.3 million metric tons of manure. The company produces biogas, and it currently operates 118 covered lagoons.In the US, the company has a target to install biogas systems on 90% of its finishing farms and contract locations by 2030. It also mentions another project by which sludge is dried using drying beds in the desert to produce 30,000 tons of dry organic fertiliser per year, which the company mentions is easier to handle. In China, the company mentions it started a biomass natural gas project, by which it processes 400 metric tons of chicken manure per day. It also mentions that 100% of the manure produced in farms is converted to organic fertiliser.
The company mentions it operates 118 covered lagoons in the US. In China, the company mentions the amount of manure used to produce natural gas, but it is unclear the % of sites with covered lagoons.
Target-setting for water quality
For its operations in China, the company has internal water management mechanisms at different levels to monitor and manage water risks. In the US, the company mentions that the assessment completed in 2022 helped the company to develop water conservation strategies, inform updates to our water use policies and set performance targets. However, it’s not clear whether the company has targets for each area identified as high or medium-risk beyond meeting regulatory requirements.
Support to third-party suppliers
In China, the company mentions that it promotes circular economy featuring regional crop production and farming, using manure as organic fertiliser. The company does not disclose information about supporting third-party arable farmers with sustainable use of manure to minimise pollution risks.
In the US, the company runs the SmithfieldGro project, by which it works with upstream farmers to reduce pesticide pollution to water resources. The company also focuses on nitrogen management tools to optimise nutrient absorption and reduce the use of chemical fertilisers. It is unclear the percentage of farmers that are part of this project.
The company mentions it operates 118 covered lagoons in the US and the company has a target to install biogas systems on 90% of its finishing farms and contract locations by 2030 in the US. However, it is unclear the % of suppliers with covered lagoons. In China, it is unclear whether suppliers have covered lagoons.
Circularity
Poor
Pilot projects around nutrient circularity
Smithfield Foods had partnered with Anuvia Plant Nutrients to develop and market bio-based fertiliser products from hog manure. However, Anuvia Plant’s finished its operations in 2023. The company still discloses this partnership in its report.
Disclosure of investment in circular solutions
The company does not disclose information about this.
Targets to increase share of manure under circular initiatives
The company does not disclose information about this.
Company Engagement
Medium
Level of company engagement with the coalition
The company did not provide a response to the investor letter and did not respond to the engagement questions. The company met with FAIRR but declined the meeting with investors. The company did not acknowledge the FAIRR’s assessment and did not provide feedback.
Workstream Information
2024/25 level
Poor
Index Waste & Pollution Score:
23/100
Assessed Proteins:
Pork
Last Updated:
26 June 2024
2024/25 Resources
Waste & Pollution Engagement